Re: Proposed refresh algorithm changes

From: Henrik Nordstrom <hno@dont-contact.us>
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 1998 22:48:03 +0200

Andres Kroonmaa wrote:

> about flags, to conserve structure size, we might use lowest 1-2
> bits of any relevant timestamp for bit-flags. We loose 1-4 sec on
> precision which is not a very big issue I guess.

How many refresh_pattern do you have? I don't think storage size is a
very big issue here.

We are not talking about adding a flag to store entries, only to the
refresh_pattern entries.

/Henrik
Received on Tue Jul 29 2003 - 13:15:51 MDT

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 16:11:49 MST