Re: 1.2b20 and memory

From: Duane Wessels <wessels@dont-contact.us>
Date: Wed, 20 May 1998 11:24:27 -0600

Karl Ferguson writes:

>Howdy.
>
>I upgraded from 1.NOVM.21 to 1.2b20 on a test machine to basically try to
>see if performance increased and install it system wide... However, I
>notice it's using around 70meg of ram for only 630meg of cache; that's
>like a 1:9 ratio (and no, at the moment there's hardly anything being
>transferred).
>
><grin> My question - is there a NOVM version? :-) (1.NOVM.21 used to sit
>on around 40-60meg usage on a 3.5gig cache) That machine has 128meg of ram
>and if it's that a bad ratio of memory then I'll run out before I each
>5gig. Intersting enough, I've set cache_mem to 50 meg and turned off
>memory pooling.
>
>I notice from the cachemgr output that there's around 40meg for the "Store
>Mem Buffer" allocated so I gather that that's where it's all gone to.

How about

        cache_mem 2

Duane W.
Received on Wed May 20 1998 - 10:26:26 MDT

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 16:40:15 MST