Re: Squid vs. NetCache

Bet you ten bucks that they didn't have anyone who really knows how to
tune squid for high-performance.

D

WaiSun Chia wrote:
>
> Dear fellow squidsters,
> I've stumbled upon this while surfing, especially check out the 2 graphs
> depicting Max URLs per hour and Median Response time.
>
> Are they for real or just a lot of hot air? Any Squid gurus are familiar
> with the Harvest Benchmark?
>
> "NetCache delivered significantly higher throughput
> and faster response time than Squid or other Unix based web caching
> commercial solutions,
> as shown in comparisons below. This workload consisted of a data
> set with a size of
> 221MB, 15000 URLs and a cache hit rate of 30%."
>
> More details at:
> http://www.netapp.com/products/level3/netcache/webcache.html
>
> Wai Sun

-- 
-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.1
GAT d- s++: a C++++$ UL++++B+++S+++C++H++U++V+++$ P+++$ L+++ E-
W+++(--)$ N++ w++$>--- t+ 5++ X+() R+ tv b++++ DI+++ e- h-@ 
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------