RE: [SQU] windows update doesn't seem to cache anymore

So I guess the obvious question then is what is the expected timeframe for
Squid supporting the full HTTP 1.1 spec?

Will that be in 2.4, or later?

Next Year?
Late?
Or further than that?

Thanks,
PhiL P

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Robert Collins [mailto:robert.collins@itdomain.com.au]
> Sent: Monday, November 06, 2000 3:30 PM
> To: Steve Koch
> Cc: squid-users@ircache.net
> Subject: Re: [SQU] windows update doesn't seem to cache anymore
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Dr. Michael Weller" <eowmob@exp-math.uni-essen.de>
> To: "Steve Koch" <SKoch@andersonchemical.com>
> Cc: <squid-users@ircache.net>
> Sent: Tuesday, November 07, 2000 4:10 AM
> Subject: Re: [SQU] windows update doesn't seem to cache anymore
>
>
> > On Mon, 6 Nov 2000, Steve Koch wrote:
> >
> > > Running Squid 2.3.STABLE4 on FreeBSD 2.2.8. Squid used to cache
> Microsoft's
> > > Windows Update site quite nicely allowing me to quickly
> run Windows
> Update
> > > on my machines in my network. However, as of late I get
> all TCP_MISS's
> when
> > > it comes to Microsoft's Windows Update site. Does anyone know of
> anything
> > > with Squid that would cause this or has Microsoft changed
> something with
> > > that particular site whereas it doesn't allow those objects to be
> cached?
> > > Any help/insight would be appreciated. Thanks.
> >
> > Sorry, only guessing here. I'd suggest you add log_mime_hdrs to your
> > config and look in the logs what M$ returns to squid.
> >
> > I would assume that squid is not provided with and can't find out
> > what the modification time, expiry period of that file is.
>
> Another possibility is that MS has started sending http/1.1
> information such
> as Vary headers and squid is detecting and not caching the
> result because of
> that.
>
> <snip>
>
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, see http://www.squid-cache.org/mailing-lists.html
>
>

--
To unsubscribe, see http://www.squid-cache.org/mailing-lists.html