Re: [squid-users] squid's capability

John Doe wrote:
>>> Talking about benchmarks; I did get around 770 r/s and was wondering why...
>>> In fact, it was just because my test object was 15KB.
>>> With a 1KB object, I get 5000+ r/s.
>>> So, what is the "usual" size of test objects for the benchmarks...?
>> If you're running benchmarks then can you please provide some CPU and
>> IO profiling where appropriate?
>> I would like to know why a 15KB object cops out at 770req/sec but a
>> 1KB object cops out at 5000 req/sec.
>
> Should have added that my 100Mb switch must be the reason: 770*15*8 ~= 92400 Mb/s
> My benchmarks are pretty basic for now (always the same object) so not really worth mentioning.
> I might give some in the future when the setup is finalized.
> I was just curious about the effect of objects size choice in others benchmarks...
> The smaller, the faster... no?

Probably.

The only 'recent' results contributed so far have been spot checks taken
from real-world caches. So likely to have a wide range of objects. And a
likewise large error margin.

Amos

-- 
Please use Squid 2.7.STABLE4 or 3.0.STABLE8