Re: [squid-users] Squid-3.2.0.x observations

From: Amos Jeffries <squid3_at_treenet.co.nz>
Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2010 21:55:52 +1200

Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
> * Amos Jeffries <squid3_at_treenet.co.nz>:
>> On Wed, 11 Aug 2010 20:03:46 +0200, Ralf Hildebrandt
>> <Ralf.Hildebrandt_at_charite.de> wrote:
>>> Somehow, the loop detection has changed! In 3.0 and 3.1 I could use:
>>>
>>> cache_peer proxy-cvk-1.charite.de sibling 8080 3130 default
>>> cache_peer proxy-cvk-2.charite.de sibling 8080 3130 default
>>> cache_peer proxy-cbf-1.charite.de sibling 8080 3130 default
>>> cache_peer proxy-cbf-2.charite.de sibling 8080 3130 default
>>>
>>> on all 4 proxies, and each proxy had an "include" with:
>>>
>>> include /etc/squid3/unique_hostname.conf
>>>
>>> which would contain:
>>>
>>> visible_hostname proxy-cvk-1.charite.de
>>> # on proxy-cvk-1.charite.de of course!
>>>
>>> This doesn't work with 3.2.0 anymore. The goal is to use "mostly"
>>> identical configs an all 4 hosts!
>> ? loading the include properly?
>
> Of course. That works with 3.0 and 3.1!
>

Okay, so whats the difference between the transmitted Via: headers and
"squidclient mgr:config | grep visible_hostname" ?

Amos

-- 
Please be using
   Current Stable Squid 2.7.STABLE9 or 3.1.6
   Beta testers wanted for 3.2.0.1
Received on Thu Aug 12 2010 - 09:56:05 MDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Thu Aug 12 2010 - 12:00:03 MDT