Re: [squid-users] odd redirector behaviour

From: Brett Lymn <brett.lymn_at_baesystems.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2011 16:29:49 +1030

On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 06:03:27PM +1300, Amos Jeffries wrote:
>
> As I understand it Websense for 3.x works differently than for 2.x. Due
> to the Websense patches on 2.x needed to use the URL-rewriter API for
> content scanning. With 3.x it just uses ICAP.
>

We are just using the "old" redirector method that we used with squid
2.x, it seems to be working correctly most of the time. Just some times
it seems to mess up.

> If it is Websense, you should contact them about support. They have been
> very restricted in what they will share with us about the integration
> patches.
>

Ah yes :) They have been known to contact me about how to make websense
work with later versions of squid... I don't hold much hope for this,
besides what I am doing is "unsupported" - would you believe they don't
support rhel 5 as an OS platform?

> I think you can test if it is Websense by looking at the resulting page
> source code and object URLs vs what should have been received without
> the filtering. Blank pages are often a sign that the page itself is so
> broken the browser can't cope. Could be broken at the web server right
> at the start and the filter change is just enough to push it over into
> browser failure.
>

This could easily be the problem - the site is http://www.news.com.au/
it is not the nicest site about, if you refresh a few time or revisit
the page that comes up blank it eventually comes up mainly, I think,
because the ad that websense is blocking has rotated out.

-- 
Brett Lymn
"Warning:
The information contained in this email and any attached files is
confidential to BAE Systems Australia. If you are not the intended
recipient, any use, disclosure or copying of this email or any
attachments is expressly prohibited.  If you have received this email
in error, please notify us immediately. VIRUS: Every care has been
taken to ensure this email and its attachments are virus free,
however, any loss or damage incurred in using this email is not the
sender's responsibility.  It is your responsibility to ensure virus
checks are completed before installing any data sent in this email to
your computer."
Received on Wed Oct 26 2011 - 05:59:59 MDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Wed Oct 26 2011 - 12:00:02 MDT