adamneat@ipax.com.au writes:
>> I have just upgraded to Squid v1.1.6, running on FreeBSD 2.1.6, 64MB, 2GB
>> cache.
>>
>> Can someone tell me the difference of parents and siblings? How does Squid
>> handle the two differently?
>>
>> After monitoring the Squid access log file for a few minutes, it seems to
>> me that if an object is obtained from either a parent or a sibling, my
>> Squid does not store the object in its cache. Thus when the same object is
>> requested again, the Squid will go to the parent/sibling for it, again.
>>
>> Is this true? If so, can I configure my Squid to cache everything came
>> from all parents and siblings?
It should not be true.
>
>Hi
>
>Im under the same impression. DOES anyone know a way around this? I
>also find that since the upgrade from 1.0.10 to 1.1.6 that more data
>is being retrieved from remote proxy's?!??!?
>
>AND, what about a message that comes up sometimes:
>
>Unknown Server Reply 0!
Its a Squid bug, fixed in the next version.
Duane W.
Received on Wed Feb 19 1997 - 13:59:55 MST
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 16:34:29 MST