Hi Mario,
I am quite sure your problem is a memory problem (hardware), which
is very common in cheap PCs. You notice this problem in squid because it
uses extensively RAM memory.
We had the ssame problems in our machines until we changed the memory to
good EDO ones.
Hope this helps,
-- Ricardo Galli ATLAS Internet Access Provider mailto:gallir@atlas-iap.es http://www.atlas-iap.es On Tue, 11 Mar 1997, Mario de Mello Bittencourt Neto wrote: > Hi folks, > Last week I have posted one email abou the "Kernel Panic : End of free > list.." that I have received in my linux box (linux 2.0.29, squid 1.0.22). > I've mentioned that it was the second time and that machine work as > proxy and www server (apache). > I have received some answers with possible causes : memory, swap and > file descriptors were the suspects. > Well, I have 64 MB of RAM and 70 MB of swap space. By the time the > first "Kernel Panic" happened I had up to 9 dial-up clients using the > cache so the memory/swap does not seem to be the bad guy. > I have the file descriptor limit (256 right?). > > Before I try to apply that non-official patch is there any test that I > could use to test if the problem is this ? Is there anyone using squid > with a linux box and this patch applied ? > > Thanks, Mario. > > +---------------------------------------------------------------------+ > | Mario de Mello Bittencourt Neto System Administrator | > | WebSlave ! Argo Internet Provider | > +---------------------------------------------------------------------+ > | Key fingerprint = CB B8 0E 90 EE 9C D1 91 B5 5E B1 EC 83 4D 78 9B | > +---------------------------------------------------------------------+ >Received on Tue Mar 11 1997 - 06:41:51 MST
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 16:34:40 MST