I noticed something with ftpget/1.1.20 today that I thought was "new"; I
was wondering if anyone else agrees that this is "wrong" (despite it being
mainly cosmetic).
Using Squid/1.1.20, do a query using ftp:// (ie., force usage of ftpget)
that requests a known non-existant FTP URL. The "Generated" date/time at
the bottom of the error page is "Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 GMT" instead
of a more contemporary date/time. Oops! A quick check of a nearby
Squid/1.1.16 shows what I expected. I kinda suspect this didn't happen
with Squid/1.1.18, but I don't want to reinstall it just to find out!
A quick compare of the 1.1.18 vs 1.1.20 sources indicates a switch from
using http_time() to using mkrfc1123() for generating these dates/times.
The respective routines are:
[src/ftpget.c-1.1.18]
static const char *
http_time(time_t t)
{
struct tm *gmt;
time_t when;
static char tbuf[128];
when = t ? t : time(NULL);
gmt = gmtime(&when);
strftime(tbuf, 128, "%A, %d-%b-%y %H:%M:%S GMT", gmt);
return tbuf;
}
[lib/rfc1123.c-1.1.20]
const char *
mkrfc1123(time_t t)
{
static char buf[128];
struct tm *gmt = gmtime(&t);
buf[0] = '\0';
strftime(buf, 127, RFC1123_STRFTIME, gmt);
return buf;
}
Presumably this is something to do with mkrfc1123() being called with a
NULL param. Call me crazy, but shouldn't there be a call to "time(NULL)"
in that second routine (either that, or the NULL call to mkrfc1123 should
be changed in ftpget.c)?
As I said, mainly cosmetic.
Cheers..
dave
*** squid-1.1.20/lib/rfc1123.c.orig Thu Jan 8 09:59:34 1998
--- squid-1.1.20/lib/rfc1123.c Mon Feb 23 23:35:37 1998
***************
*** 271,279 ****
mkrfc1123(time_t t)
{
static char buf[128];
! struct tm *gmt = gmtime(&t);
!
buf[0] = '\0';
strftime(buf, 127, RFC1123_STRFTIME, gmt);
return buf;
--- 271,280 ----
mkrfc1123(time_t t)
{
static char buf[128];
+ struct tm *gmt;
! t = t ? t : time(NULL); /* time(t), anyone? ;-) */
! gmt = gmtime(&t);
buf[0] = '\0';
strftime(buf, 127, RFC1123_STRFTIME, gmt);
return buf;
Received on Mon Feb 23 1998 - 04:46:05 MST
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 16:38:57 MST