Yes, I have several web-based mail/chat sites blocked (the client is a
school and those types of sites are a big problem for them). I can see
why those might account for the use of the FQDN part of Squid, but do you
have any ideas why the IPcache would be in a virtual shutdown?
I have one other cache running with very similar site blockings, and it
doesn't behave in this way. This other cache uses the FQDN cache (not by
my doing directly, but presumably for the blocked sites), but its IPcache
is functioning normally.
-Bill
On Thu, 12 Mar 1998, Duane Wessels wrote:
> Bill Wichers writes:
>
> >I sent this once before but only recieve one reply regarding upgrading the
> >kernel (which does need doing, but we would have to bill the client and
> >they don't want to spend the money...). Does anyone know what would make
> >Squid's FQDN cache behave the way I describe? Please help!
>
> do you have name-based access controls?
>
> Duane W.
>
Received on Thu Mar 12 1998 - 15:46:17 MST
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 16:39:21 MST