Re: windows

Looks lovely, for the windows fans, otherwise I feel like holding a
moment's silence. :)

D

Duane Wessels wrote:
>
> Dancer writes:
>
> >I'm afraid not. 'WIN32' seems to be defined by the majority of windows
> >compilers when compiling a 32-bit app (note no leading underscores), but
> >there are some that don't do it, or (like VisC/++) just don't do it
> >consistantly.
>
> Ok, so here's what I have now in include/config.h.in
>
> #elif defined(__CYGWIN32__) || defined(WIN32) || defined(WINNT)
> #define _SQUID_MSWIN_
>
> Look reasonable?

-- 
-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.1
GAT d- s++: a C++++$ UL++++B+++S+++C++H++U++V+++$ P+++$ L+++ E-
W+++(--)$ N++ w++$>--- t+ 5++ X+() R+ tv b++++ DI+++ e- h-@ 
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------