RE: TCP_HIT in Squid 1.1.X is the same as in Squid2.0??

Is there any canonical list of the new tags? Will the FAQ be updated?

Thanks,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Alex Rousskov [mailto:rousskov@nlanr.net]
> Sent: Thursday, October 08, 1998 3:54 AM
> To: Javier Puche. CSIC RedIRIS
> Cc: squid-users@ircache.net
> Subject: Re: TCP_HIT in Squid 1.1.X is the same as in Squid2.0??
>
>
> On Wed, 7 Oct 1998, Javier Puche. CSIC RedIRIS wrote:
>
> > Hello all,
> >
> > After migrating from Squid 1.1.21 on a Sun Ultra 2 Solaris 2.6 to
> > Squid 2.0 on the same platform and experiencing an amazing
> speed up of
> > the cache, I do not understand why the output of
> calamaris.pl (v 1.20)
> > shows TCP_HIT latencies quite higher than before, even
> though the user
> > perception does not correspond to that.
>
> TCP_HIT in Squid 2.0 is the same as in Squid 1.1, I guess.
> There are new
> types of hits though if you are using Cache Digests. I do not know if
> calamaris can automatically detect new tags in the access log.
>
> Apart from that, how does Calamaris measure the "average"
> transfer speed?
> Does it use means or medians? If means are used, the delay-
> or time-related
> stats tell you pretty much nothing (regardless of Squid
> version) because of a
> huge heavy tails of delay distributions.
>
> The correlation between median delays and user perception of
> "speed" is the
> third, still unanswered, question!
>
> $0.02,
>
> Alex.
>
Received on Wed Oct 07 1998 - 16:35:40 MDT