Re: delay pool example

David,

Thanks for your reply

> >
> > acl subnet1 src 192.168.1.0/255.255.255.192
> > acl subnet2 src 192.168.1.64/255.255.255.192
> > acl subnet3 src 192.168.1.128/255.255.255.128
> > acl gate1 src 192.168.1.9/255.255.255.255
> >
> > delay_class1_access deny subnet2
> > delay_class1_access deny subnet3
> > delay_class1_access deny gate1
>
> simply:
>
> delay_class1_access deny all
>
> ...with the default rule for 'all'. You should also 'deny all' at the
> end of the class2 rules and for the class3 rules since it appears you
> want 'subnet1' to not fall into any rules.
>
> > delay_class2_access allow subnet2
> > delay_class2_access allow subnet3
> > delay_class2_access allow gate1
> >
> > delay_class2_aggregate_max 5000
> > delay_class2_aggregate_restore 4000
> >
> > Now would that limit all the subnets and the individual host to maximum
>> of
> > 40kbits/sec. Are the above correct.
>
> You have only specified an aggregate limit - if this is all you want, you
> should be using class1. You haven't specified an individual limit.
>
> ie:
>
> delay_class2_aggregate_max 5000 # limit pool to 5kbytes
> delay_class2_aggregate_restore 4000 # grow pool at 32kbps

Does aggregate_restore means it will restore the speed upto this limit. i.e
start at 5000 and then reduce the burst to this limit.

> delay_class2_individual_max 5000 # limit individual pool to 5kbytes
> delay_class2_individual_restore 2000 # grow pool at 16kbps

Would the above allow individual to use the whole pool as well as
delay_class2_individual_max 5000 which is same as arregate. Should the
individual_max be less than aggregate_max.

delay_class2_individual_max 2500 # limit individual pool to 5kbytes
delay_class2_individual_restore 2000 # grow pool at 16kbps

What about the above ? Also will "gate1" as in my acl, fall under
delay_class2_individual ?

> otherwise one individual can take up the entire pool.
> (as with class1)
>
> class2 is the appropriate class if you do want to use individual rules
> since all hosts fall into the same 8-bit network; however if you want
> only an aggregate rule, class1 is better.
>
> David.

Irfan Akber
Received on Thu Feb 25 1999 - 04:47:33 MST