Julian Richardson wrote:
> The machine's got two 9GB SCSI disks in it. Now, I'd expect it's better
> to put the core OS, swap, binaries etc on one disk and the cache on the
> other for performance reasons. What about the logs though? Any idea if
> it's better to have those on the OS disk or the cache disk, given that
> they'll generate a disk access of their own fairly often?
I would spread things evenly on both disk.
OS+binaries+configuration mirrored on both disks to ease recovery if one
disk should fail. Swap configured on both disks if needed
(non-mirrored).
The remaining space on each disk used for two separate (non-mirrored)
cache_dirs, one on each drive.
I am not sure what I would do with the logs.
-- Henrik Nordstrom Spare time Squid hackerReceived on Fri Jun 11 1999 - 16:02:24 MDT
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 16:46:50 MST