All,
I am the admin for a large Fortune 500 company using squid. I am
currently supporting 55,000 clients using squid in a multi-tiered arch.
using Sun UE250s. I am currently peered using ICP with local machines
using 46gb of cache, and NLANR using digests. I average less than
1.6sec response time per page.
Squid's kickin' major buttocks. :)
L8r.
Jim Richey wrote:
>
> Thanks to all that have repied so far. The CERN proxy came packaged with
> our firewall (Secure Computing's Sidewinder). While the firewall product
> works very well, the proxy server's performance is starting to become a
> problem with over 4000 users. I'll definitely check out caching.com.
> Thanks for the info.
>
> Alex Rousskov wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, 18 Oct 1999, Jim Richey wrote:
> >
> > > Perhaps a bit off topic, but does anyone have or know where there exists
> > > a list of Fortune 500 companies using Squid? We are trying to move from
> > > the outdated CERN proxy to squid and our senior management is requesting
> > > a list of other Fortune 500 companies that are using it. Any help would
> > > be greatly appreciated.
> >
> > Does your management have a list of Fortune 500 companies using CERN
> > proxy? Just curious (might be a good idea to sell their stock short). :)
> >
> > If a company is using Squid _and_ sends some requests to your Web site,
> > you can probably detect that. This approach can be a way of compiling
> > the Squid-500 list you are talking about. You can also try to purchase
> > this info from caching.com or other market-research companies.
> >
> > $0.02,
> >
> > Alex.
>
> --
>
> Jim Richey
> jrichey@highmark.com
> Highmark, Inc.
> http://www.highmark.com
Received on Mon Oct 18 1999 - 14:13:14 MDT
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 16:48:57 MST