On Mon, 30 Oct 2000, Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
> The heart of thins is http.c:httpCachableReply(), and this is probably a
> good place to start when looking into why the object does not get
> cached.
>
> Hmm.. reading the code it even has a comment that such replies are not
> cached when received from cache peers... I think you will find it if you
> look for it. A possible "fix" is to change the "return 0" to "return 1"
> some lines below that. This safeguard probably exists to protect from
> misbehaving caches.
Well, yes, my actual problem is I do not understand httpCachableReply()
especially because it checks zillions of internal bits, whose meaning is
unknown to me. I also do not want to change the caching of the other
files. Where would I put my "return 1" in httpCachableReply()
to deal only with this (or only a "little" more) case(s).
That cache peer, btw, is not a real cache but a virus scanner. It really
makes no sense to leave the caching to the peer here.
Michael.
-- Michael Weller: eowmob@exp-math.uni-essen.de, eowmob@ms.exp-math.uni-essen.de, or even mat42b@spi.power.uni-essen.de. If you encounter an eowmob account on any machine in the net, it's very likely it's me. -- To unsubscribe, see http://www.squid-cache.org/mailing-lists.htmlReceived on Tue Oct 31 2000 - 03:59:17 MST
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 16:56:03 MST