Re: [SQU] windows update doesn't seem to cache anymore

Probably quite some time - there are over 400 requirements to be http/1.1
compliant. However http/1.1 compliance does not mean that all responses will
be cacheable - just that squid will not cause confusion when it sites
between a http/1.1 client & server, and claims to be http/1.1 compliant. To
be able to cache Vary responses is a project completely separate from
http/1.1 compliance - it could be worked on now...

Rob
----- Original Message -----
From: "Phil Pierotti" <phil.pierotti@QUOKKA.com>
To: <squid-users@ircache.net>
Sent: Tuesday, November 07, 2000 10:40 AM
Subject: RE: [SQU] windows update doesn't seem to cache anymore

> So I guess the obvious question then is what is the expected timeframe for
> Squid supporting the full HTTP 1.1 spec?
>
> Will that be in 2.4, or later?
>
> Next Year?
> Late?
> Or further than that?
>
> Thanks,
> PhiL P
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Robert Collins [mailto:robert.collins@itdomain.com.au]
> > Sent: Monday, November 06, 2000 3:30 PM
> > To: Steve Koch
> > Cc: squid-users@ircache.net
> > Subject: Re: [SQU] windows update doesn't seem to cache anymore
> >
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Dr. Michael Weller" <eowmob@exp-math.uni-essen.de>
> > To: "Steve Koch" <SKoch@andersonchemical.com>
> > Cc: <squid-users@ircache.net>
> > Sent: Tuesday, November 07, 2000 4:10 AM
> > Subject: Re: [SQU] windows update doesn't seem to cache anymore
> >
> >
> > > On Mon, 6 Nov 2000, Steve Koch wrote:
> > >
> > > > Running Squid 2.3.STABLE4 on FreeBSD 2.2.8. Squid used to cache
> > Microsoft's
> > > > Windows Update site quite nicely allowing me to quickly
> > run Windows
> > Update
> > > > on my machines in my network. However, as of late I get
> > all TCP_MISS's
> > when
> > > > it comes to Microsoft's Windows Update site. Does anyone know of
> > anything
> > > > with Squid that would cause this or has Microsoft changed
> > something with
> > > > that particular site whereas it doesn't allow those objects to be
> > cached?
> > > > Any help/insight would be appreciated. Thanks.
> > >
> > > Sorry, only guessing here. I'd suggest you add log_mime_hdrs to your
> > > config and look in the logs what M$ returns to squid.
> > >
> > > I would assume that squid is not provided with and can't find out
> > > what the modification time, expiry period of that file is.
> >
> > Another possibility is that MS has started sending http/1.1
> > information such
> > as Vary headers and squid is detecting and not caching the
> > result because of
> > that.
> >
> > <snip>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > To unsubscribe, see http://www.squid-cache.org/mailing-lists.html
> >
> >
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, see http://www.squid-cache.org/mailing-lists.html
>
>

--
To unsubscribe, see http://www.squid-cache.org/mailing-lists.html