Re: [squid-users] some ACLs are more important than others

One alternative is to make the others always limited below the maximum
of the link, leaving sufficient amount of space for your VIP persons.

Another is to have Squid extended to support prioritisation of certain
clients in delay pool traffic.

Regards
Henrik

On Thursday 19 December 2002 17.37, Dan Cave wrote:
> Ilia,
>
> I'm not aware that you can do this in squid at the moment....
> sounds like you need to setup some kind of http packet shaping rule
> using QoS using linux/xBSD for your two users, failing that get a
> layer 7 application switch...
>
> d.
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Илья Шипицин" <ilia@academy.urc.ac.ru>
> To: <squid-users@squid-cache.org>
> Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 4:19 AM
> Subject: [squid-users] some ACLs are more important than others
>
>
> Dear Sirs,
>
> I'd like to implement the following setup:
>
> two clients, BigBoss and NotABigBoss, each has certain ACL
> assigned.
>
> is there possibility to tell squid that traffic according to the
> first ACL is "more important" ?
>
> any idea ?
>
> delay pools are good, but I don't want to shape NotABigBoss, if
> there's no other traffic, I don't want to bound him to certain
> bandwidth.
>
> Regards, (Наилучшие пожелания)
> Ilia Chipitsine (Илья Шипицин)
Received on Thu Dec 19 2002 - 11:14:32 MST