Adam Aube wrote:
>I recall a discussion on ufs vs aufs vs diskd some time ago.
>
>(If I recall correctly)
>
>With a single cache disk, aufs is better on Linux and diskd
>is better on other OSes.
>
>However, when you have multiple cache disks, diskd is better
>regardless of platform.
>
>
Adam,
'Multiple cache disks', does that included hardware raids, because that
are also 'multiple disks'.
(but one disk for the OS).
I will do some tests regarding this in the future.
Bart
Received on Fri Aug 08 2003 - 12:26:05 MDT
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 17:18:47 MST