Re: [squid-users] testing ntlm_auth shipped with samba 3

Adam, I'm afraid you're wrong.
ntlm_auth shipped with squid 2.5 latest tarrball work perfectly with
samba3!!!!!!

:-(

I'm going mad...

----- Original Message -----
From: "Adam Aube" <aaube@firstindependent.net>
To: <squid-users@squid-cache.org>
Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2003 2:53 PM
Subject: RE: [squid-users] testing ntlm_auth shipped with samba 3

> > what are the advantages using ntlm_auth shipped with samba3
> > instead of the same shipped with squid ?
>
> The one shipped with Squid will not work with Samba 3, whereas the one
> that ships with Samba 3 will. That's a big advantage. :)
>
> > Better using it with samba 2.2.8a, wb_group and wb_ntlmauth
> > works, and there is no other ntlm_auth except from squid one!
>
> That is a choice only you can make. However, if you use AD now or plan
> to use it in the future, I would recommend you use Samba 3 - the
> integration is much better and lets you take advantage of the improved
> security of AD over the NT 4 domain model.
>
> Note that there is a Perl-based winbind_group helper that works with
> Samba 3, so you don't have to give up the group support in Squid if
> you move to Samba 3.
>
> Adam
>
>
Received on Wed Nov 05 2003 - 07:30:52 MST