>>> Henrik Nordstrom <hno@squid-cache.org> 12/22/03 11:13AM >>>
On Mon, 22 Dec 2003, Pete Davis wrote:
>> I have been using squid for about 13 months+ with no problems
>> (2.5.STABLE1-20021105). I tried to get into cachemgr and I only
get
>> "connect: (61) connection refused" (it says generated by
cachemgr.cgi) .
>Then you did not specify the correct server and/or port where
cachemgr.cgi
>should connect. This should be the same as your browsers are using for
>talking to the proxy.
>It may also be a firewall issue preventing cachemgr.cgi from talking
to
>the same.
>> I have checked my firewall settings and port 80 to the server is
>> allowed. Since it allows me to the cachemgr screen, I have ruled
out a
>> firewall problem.
>This test does not rule out the firewall.
>There is two traffic flows involved here
> a) Browser <-> cachemgr.cgi on your web server on port 80
> b) cachemgr.cgi on the web server <-> Squid on the proxy port
>It is not a login problem.
>Regards
>>Henrik
>>>>>>>>>>>>
Darn my stupidity. :( I kept using localhost but it needed the IP of
the server. I must have been confusing it with some other server I use
(not squid)...
Thanks for the quick help. I have documented it properly so I don't
have this brain cramp again.
BTW, I almost had the big titles convinced to try 3 squid proxies to
replace our single Volera. Since our current SLA allows us multiple ICS
boxes for the same price, I couldn't make the argument about saving
money (I couldn't convince them but I tried). The one I am running is a
secondary gateway to the internet just for IT people to use (when the
primary internet channel goes down mostly).
Pete
Received on Mon Dec 22 2003 - 10:28:29 MST
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Thu Jan 01 2004 - 12:00:26 MST