Well, the cache_mem thing sounds interesting. I'm going to try 512MB to
start with.
My filesystem isn't close to 90% full. Only about 6 gigs being using in
total (including the cache).
I appreciate all your suggestions.
Regards,
Tim
Matus UHLAR - fantomas <uhlar@fantomas.sk>
03/30/2004 03:22 AM
To: squid-users@squid-cache.org
cc:
Subject: Re: [squid-users] Cache Size Limitation
On 29.03 10:36, trainier@kalsec.com wrote:
> 32-bit Architecture. What would you suggest cache_mem to be on a system
> with 1 gig of ram?
Ah! if you only have 1 gig of RAM, you really shouldn't set cache_mem to
more... all of squid data should be in memory. As long as squid and system
consume some memory even w/o squid cache, I'd set it to 512MB.
Maybe then, if you have no other services running, and memory usage shows
free memory, I'd grow it up to ~768MB
> What would you suggest as a maximum_object_size ??
my experiences (watching logs and trying to find the biggest file that was
fetched more than once) showed 20MB. I have 30GB spool; in your case it
could be lower - I'd start with 20MB and after a week or two I'd check the
same
> The filesystem is 40gig.
> What do you mean by, "if the filesystem usage gets too big" ??
If filesystem is filled over 90%, write operations with it start take too
much of CPU time and disk i/o.
-- Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uhlar@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/ Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address. Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu. Spam is for losers who can't get business any other way.Received on Wed Mar 31 2004 - 07:42:33 MST
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Thu Apr 01 2004 - 12:00:03 MST