Re: [squid-users] "aufs" vs "ufs"

From: Henrik Nordstrom <hno@dont-contact.us>
Date: Thu, 4 Nov 2004 22:26:54 +0100 (CET)

On Thu, 4 Nov 2004, Matt wrote:

> On a Squid cache with a single IDE drive under heavy load will switching from
> "ufs" to "aufs" improve performance?

Yes.

> If so about how much?

About 100% IIRC. More if the drive is slow.

Regards
Henrik
Received on Thu Nov 04 2004 - 14:26:59 MST

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Henrik Nordstrom: "Re: [squid-users] Re: use of remotep roxy for specified domains"
Previous message: Henrik Nordstrom: "Re: [squid-users] reverse caching proxy with authentication no caching at all (TCP_MISS)/RELEASE"
In reply to: Matt: "[squid-users] "aufs" vs "ufs""

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wed Dec 01 2004 - 12:00:01 MST