> > On 15.11 14:08, Houssam Melhem wrote:
> > > I configured squid to use 28 GB on each
> > >
> > > cache_mem 512 MB
> > > cache_dir aufs /cache1/ 28000 32 256
> > > cache_dir aufs /cache2/ 28000 32 256
> > > cache_dir aufs /cache3/ 28000 32 256
> > > cache_dir aufs /cache4/ 28000 32 256
> > > cache_dir aufs /cache5/ 28000 32 256
> > > cache_dir aufs /cache6/ 28000 32 256
> > > cache_dir aufs /cache7/ 28000 32 256
> > > cache_dir aufs /cache8/ 28000 32 256
> > > cache_dir aufs /cache9/ 28000 32 256
> > > cache_dir aufs /cache10/ 28000 32 256
> On 11/16/05, Matus UHLAR - fantomas <uhlar@fantomas.sk> wrote:
> > I'd use '64 256'
On 17.11 10:59, Houssam Melhem wrote:
> I tryed '64 256' for sometime, but i noticed that only 31 dirs where
> used the other dirs were empty, and I thought this will decrease
> memory usage
Oh, that's different. It probably won't take more memory but if the dirs
aren't used, you don't need to increase that.
> > the "full system crash" will probably be problem of your OS or bad HW. OS
> > should not crash unless you have bad hardware. What errors are displayed
> > when crash happens?
> Something like: kernel panic not syncing , Error handling interrup
> and squid process ID is mentioned in the error report
hmmm, that seems as a problem in your kernel...
> > I think you can safely use 50GB on each cache_dir, files up to 64MB (with
> > LFUDA replacement policy) and squid should fit to 8GB of memory w/o any
> > problem.
>
> What do you mean by "files up to 64MB"?
maximum_object_size 64 MB
-- Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uhlar@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/ Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address. Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu. Windows 2000: 640 MB ought to be enough for anybodyReceived on Mon Nov 21 2005 - 03:12:55 MST
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Thu Dec 01 2005 - 12:00:10 MST