Re: [squid-users] Best Caching Engine

From: Kinkie <kinkie-squid@dont-contact.us>
Date: Mon, 29 May 2006 12:47:57 +0200

On Sat, 2006-05-27 at 12:18 -0700, Aaron Chu wrote:
> According to my discussion with some vendors, the C2300 does this:
> 1200 http transactions per sec in forward proxy (I believe the
> effective hit ratio is 55% for this test set)
> 1800 http tps in reverse proxy (90% hit ratio for this test set)
> As for throughput, it probably comes with a few ports of gigabit
> ethernet connectivity, but it can be expanded with additional ports.
> It has 6 144gb 15k rpm fc disks, and I assume it uses the same io
> architecture as most of the other netapp products.

You need to watch out for ACL complexity: I've had an experience with
NetCache appliances where due to a complex ACL (ported over from a
running Squid conf), the actual performance of a NetCache box was
exactly 1/3rd of the specs (600 hits/second, down from a spec of 1.8k)

        Kinkie
Received on Mon May 29 2006 - 04:48:06 MDT

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Thu Jun 01 2006 - 12:00:02 MDT