Re: [squid-users] Caching Expired Objects - One Small Step Forward

On Mon, Oct 08, 2007, Solomon Asare wrote:

> That will be great, but what I don't understand is why
> they don't want to make such a static object
> cacheable. Microsoft, Google, and those whose traffic
> take up most of the Internet's capacity should make
> their content cacheable so as to help all of us. At
> some periods windowsupdate.com takes up about 10% of
> total traffic with virtually no significant HITs.

Because the market overseas (North America, Europe) is about "how many bits can
you push" and assuming your peer is going to deal with shuffling them back to
their customers.

Adrian
Received on Mon Oct 08 2007 - 03:34:21 MDT