Re: [squid-users] Marking Cached traffic..

From: Amos Jeffries <squid3@dont-contact.us>
Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2008 01:39:52 +1200

Manoj_Rajkarnikar wrote:
> On Wed, 16 Apr 2008, Adrian Chadd wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Apr 16, 2008, Stephan Viljoen wrote:
>>> HI There,
>>>
>>> I was wondering whether it's posible to mark cached traffic with a
>>> different TOS then uncached traffic. I need to come up with a way of
>>> passing cached traffic through our bandwidth manager without taxing
>>> the end
>>> user for it. Basically giving them the full benefits of the proxy
>>> server.
>>
>> There's the http://zph.bratcheda.org/ stuff.
>
> We've been using this one since the 2.5 days and is doing the job pretty
> well. Seems quite stable. We're currently using 2.6S19.
>
>>
>> I'm probably going to roll it into my private tree after I've stabilised
>> the codebase. Someone's asked me about it.
>>
>
> will we be seeing it in the mainline tree some time in the future ??
>

I've contacted the author about getting it into 3.1 or 3.2.

Amos

-- 
Please use Squid 2.6.STABLE19 or 3.0.STABLE4
Received on Tue Apr 22 2008 - 14:39:29 MDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Thu May 01 2008 - 12:00:04 MDT