Re: [squid-users] Caching of directory objects, UDP_MISS

On Thu, 2008-05-22 at 00:18 +0200, Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
> On ons, 2008-05-21 at 14:03 -0600, Dan Trainor wrote:
> > It would make sense as to why Squid would be handing out a UDP_MISS for
> > that, since it would also make sense that Squid has no desire to cache
> > directories
>
> Squid does not make a distinction between a directory and a page or
> another HTTP objects. It's all HTTP objects.
>
> But on most servers directory listings is dynamically generated and by
> default not cacheable.
>
> However. directories with an index page quite often is cachable. For
> example http://www.squid-cache.org/Versions/v3/3.0/
>
> Regards
> Henrik

Hello, Henrik -

That would make perfect sense in what I saw, seeing as where were no
index pages being served from the URL which I saw as part of the miss.

Thanks for the explanation.

Thanks
-dant
Received on Wed May 21 2008 - 22:20:47 MDT