Re: [squid-users] Squid log formats - 2.5->2.6?

File a bug so it's not forgotten. Easy to review i code.

On tis, 2008-06-17 at 13:15 +1000, Mark Nottingham wrote:
> That reminds me; when using logformat, I've seen some counters show up
> as '-' when the value is 0. I can try to reproduce if more info is
> needed...
>
>
> On 17/06/2008, at 8:26 AM, Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
>
> > On mån, 2008-06-16 at 11:21 -0400, Mike Diggins wrote:
> >> Has something changed in the access log format between Squid
> >> 2.5Stable14
> >> and 2.6Stable20? I'm just upgrading and noticed my webalizer can no
> >> longer
> >> parse the access.log file. It complains about the date which I
> >> believe is
> >> the same on both (seconds since the Epoch).
> >>
> >> Error: Skipping record (bad date): [31/dec/1969:19:00:00 -0000] [68]
> >>
> >> In squid 2.6, I've picked the default squid format (logformat):
> >>
> >> logformat squid %ts.%03tu %6tr %>a %Ss/%03Hs %<st %rm %ru %un %Sh/
> >> %<A %mt
> >
> > Should work.
> >
> > Are you sure you told webalizer to parse a Squid access log in Squid
> > native format, and not a common log format?
> >
> > Also try without the logformat directive. The "squid" format is
> > built-in, and may differ sligtly if you redefine it with a logformat
> > directive..
> >
> > Regards
> > Henrik
>
> --
> Mark Nottingham mnot_at_yahoo-inc.com
>
>