Re: [squid-users] Problem with authentication to IIS site for users behind squid proxy

From: Adrian Chadd <adrian_at_freebsd.org>
Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2008 22:35:04 +0800

Thats because the version numbers are misleading.

Squid-2 and Squid-3 are different "paths", you can say. They probably
would benefit from being called different names, but thats a different
story.

Squid-2 has seen continued development and will see continued
development whilst people are using it.

Adrian

2008/8/15 Leonardo Rodrigues Magalhães <leolistas_at_solutti.com.br>:
>
>
> i must confess that even after reading several threads about 2.7 x 3.0
> versions, i still cant understand why 2.7 has some features that 3.0 dont !
>
> we are used to think that newer versions have all features that previous
> versions had, plus bug fixes and plus new features ....
>
> i also need NTLM in squid 3.0 and it give me some hard times once in a
> while, because i have to bypass sites that requires NTLM authentication ...
>
> i'm pretty convinced on staying on 3.0, it's pretty stable, i have had few
> problems with it .... but the lack of NTLM support is a bad one. And strange
> for me, it works in 2.7 but not in 3.0 ...
>
>
> Adrian Chadd escreveu:
>>
>> G'day,
>>
>> Squid-3.0 doesn't have the connection pinning support which proxying
>> NTLM requires.
>>
>> I've deployed Squid-2.6 and Squid-2.7 in production at various
>> government / banking environments which use NTLM authenticated portal
>> sites to great success.
>>
>
> --
>
>
> Atenciosamente / Sincerily,
> Leonardo Rodrigues
> Solutti Tecnologia
> http://www.solutti.com.br
>
> Minha armadilha de SPAM, NÃO mandem email
> gertrudes_at_solutti.com.br
> My SPAMTRAP, do not email it
>
>
>
>
>
Received on Fri Aug 15 2008 - 14:35:07 MDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Fri Aug 15 2008 - 12:00:03 MDT