> Volodymyr Kostyrko wrote:
>> Chris Robertson wrote:
>>>
>>> Is this file changed daily?
>>
>> Yep. Sometimes faster.
>
> Huh... The refresh patterns are default. If the file was changed 24
> hours ago, the refresh pattern would mark it fresh for less than 5 hours.
>
>>>
>>> The default refresh_patterns will not keep an object (without expiry
>>> information) cached for more than three days.
>>
>> I'm just curios, maybe some other headers can trigger that? Like
>> negative ETag?
>
> An ETag is just required to be a quoted string
> (http://www.w3.org/Protocols/rfc2616/rfc2616-sec3.html#sec3.11). That
> shouldn't cause problems.
>
>>
>>>>
>>>> I'm just trying to understand is this some flaw in my config or it
>>>> just should work this way.
>>>
>>> It should not work this way by default... Share your config, and
>>> perhaps we can help find the cause.
>>
>> Attached.
>
> Nothing odd there. Just to verify, is this the conf file from
> utwig.xim.biz?
>
> Henrik, Amos or someone else more knowledgeable than I, what are the
> debug_options to look at object age calculation? My bag of tricks is
> pretty much depleted...
I'm out of my depth on refresh_patterns behavior here too.
FWIW the debug of fresh/stale info is at debug level 22,3
Amos
Received on Fri Aug 29 2008 - 02:27:48 MDT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Fri Aug 29 2008 - 12:00:04 MDT