Re: [squid-users] Anonymize surfing

> On Tue, Feb 03, 2009 at 05:21:50PM +0100, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> > On 03.02.09 21:18, Vikram Goyal wrote:
> > > I want to anonymize surfing for that I have squid version 3.0 running in
> > > transparent mode. I have
> > >
> > > request_header_access From deny all
> > > request_header_access Referer deny all
> > > request_header_access Server deny all
> > > request_header_access User-Agent deny all
> > > request_header_access Via deny all
> > > request_header_access WWW-Authenticate deny all
> > > request_header_access X-Forwarded-For deny all
> > > header_replace Referer unknown
> > > header_replace User-Agent Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 6.0; en-US)
> > > header_replace Via 127.0.0.1
> > > header_replace X-Forwarded-For 127.0.0.1
> > >
> > > But it is still spewing the info on the net.
> > >
> > > What could be wrong with this config?
> >
> > are you sure users really use the proxy?

On 06.02.09 22:37, Vikram Goyal wrote:
> Well, I am the only user. Squid is running in trasparent mode.

does it really see the requests?

> This is an experimental setup. Also the http request is being diverted to
> dansguardian and then squid through iptables. The squid is logging the
> requests but checking on sites like http://grc.com identifies the browser
> and OS in use through browser requests.

are you sure _all_ requests are intercepted? aren't there any connections to
different port(s)?

-- 
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uhlar@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu.
"Two words: Windows survives." - Craig Mundie, Microsoft senior strategist
"So does syphillis. Good thing we have penicillin." - Matthew Alton