Re: [squid-users] New Accel Reverse Proxy Cache is not caching everything... how to force?

From: Henrik Nordstrom <henrik_at_henriknordstrom.net>
Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 23:36:00 +0200

mån 2009-08-17 klockan 10:28 +0200 skrev Matus UHLAR - fantomas:

> Is there any problem with current scheme where they are cached by underlying
> OS' cache?

Yes, there is a big difference in latency and CPU usage for very hot
objects, at least unless you use the ufs cache_dir type which on the
other hand scales badly with I/O if you have stuff which is not in the
OS cache..

Regards
Henrik
Received on Mon Aug 17 2009 - 21:36:30 MDT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Henrik Nordstrom: "Re: [squid-users] Issue with multiple Squids / TPROXY / WCCP and DNS load balancing"
Previous message: Henrik Nordstrom: "Re: Aw: [squid-users] default settings in the manual"
In reply to: Matus UHLAR - fantomas: "Re: [squid-users] New Accel Reverse Proxy Cache is not caching everything... how to force?"
Next in thread: Matus UHLAR - fantomas: "Re: [squid-users] New Accel Reverse Proxy Cache is not caching everything... how to force?"
Reply: Matus UHLAR - fantomas: "Re: [squid-users] New Accel Reverse Proxy Cache is not caching everything... how to force?"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Wed Aug 19 2009 - 12:00:04 MDT