Henrik Nordstrom <henrik_at_henriknordstrom.net> escribió:
> tor 2009-11-05 klockan 15:48 +1300 skrev Amos Jeffries:
>> On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 14:55:09 -0300, Guido Marino Lorenzutti
>> <glorenzutti_at_jusbaires.gov.ar> wrote:
>> > Hi people: Can someone explain to me why some of the values of memory
>> > usage are negative? Is this bad or bug?
>
>> 32-bit signed/unsigned bug. Fixed in later releases.
>
> Sure?
>
> last time I looked at this it's due to mallinfo() breakage, only
> supporting 32-bit signed values... which means garbage on any process
> larger than ca 2GB.
>
> Even confirmed by glibc developers as a wontfix issue, declaring
> mallinfo a dead end not worth fixing, but still no other better
> alternative available..
>
> Regards
> Henrik
>
>
Common... don't tell me this..
So then this isn't a bug?
If it is a bug, in which version it works?
Received on Thu Nov 05 2009 - 21:43:02 MST
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Fri Nov 06 2009 - 12:00:03 MST