Re: [squid-users] 1024 file descriptors is good

From: Mariel Sebedio <msebedio_at_invap.com.ar>
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 10:20:06 -0200

Thanks I found it this solution and in this moment works very well for
increase the max-descriptors.

The original problem was in my firewall, in this moment I have the proxy
with Squid 3.0STABLE19 on RHEL5.4 works Ok.

Thanks for all.

Luis Daniel Lucio Quiroz wrote:
> Le mardi 20 octobre 2009 16:04:16, Leonardo Rodrigues a écrit :
>
>> Mariel Sebedio escreveu:
>>
>>> Hi, I have a RHEL 5.4 with squid3.0STABLE19 and have a performance
>>> problems...
>>>
>>> My cache.log not report warning
>>>
>>> When I see in cachemgr.cgi I just have a 1024 File descriptors...
>>>
>> if you're not getting the famous WARNING in your cache.log
>>
>> WARNING! Your cache is running out of filedescriptors
>>
>> then you really dont need to worry about 1024 FDs. That's now too
>> much, but that's pretty enough for having a good number of simultaneos
>> clients.
>>
>> Filedescriptors problems (running low on them) could give you some
>> problems, but in any case you would see the warning on your logs. If
>> you're not seeing it, then problem is not filedescriptor related. And if
>> that's not filedescriptor related, raising it wont change anything.
>>
>> your performance problem is somewhere else .....
>>
>>
>
> I did fix that with this method:
> /etc/security/limits.conf:
> * - nofile 131072
>
> and configure with --with-filedescriptors=8192
>
> numbers are just a try, but you must set both of them higher than 1024. After
> that I get this error rid.
>
> LD
>
>
>

-- 
Lic. Mariel Sebedio
Division Computos y Sistemas
Tel (02944)-445400 int 2307
INVAP S.E. - www.invap.com.ar
Received on Tue Nov 10 2009 - 13:20:19 MST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Tue Nov 10 2009 - 12:00:03 MST