Re: [squid-users] Best Configuration for sibling peer

Michael Bowe wrote:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Kris [mailto:christian_at_wanxp.com]
>>
>
> Hi Kris
>
>
>> 2. TCP Connection Failed
>>
>
> Are you running iptables?
> If so, is the conntrack table overflowing?
>
>
>> my peer config
>> # cache_peer 10.10.10.10 sibling 3128 3130 no-netdb-exchange no-digest
>> no-delay round-robin proxy-only
>> cache_peer 10.10.10.11 sibling 3128 3130 no-netdb-exchange no-digest
>> no-delay round-robin proxy-only
>> cache_peer 10.10.10.12 sibling 3128 3130 no-netdb-exchange no-digest
>> no-delay round-robin proxy-only
>> cache_peer 10.10.10.13 sibling 3128 3130 no-netdb-exchange no-digest
>> no-delay round-robin proxy-only
>>
>> any suggestion what best configuration for sibling peer ?
>>
>
> I'm not sure the above is going to give you good results.
>
> Enabling digest would save a lot of ICP traffic / lookups
>
> As pointed out by Chris, "round-robin" option is used with parent selection
> in the absence of ICP. But in your case you are using peers with ICP.
>
> If you are trying to prevent overlapping disk objects between the siblings
> then I reckon your syntax should just be something like this :
>
> cache_peer 10.10.10.1x sibling 3128 3130 proxy-only
>
> Michael.
>
>
>
i`m not use any iptables.

about proxy-only lines, isnt it good to disable proxy-only ? so the
proxy dont need to take same cache in sibling, it will save icp request
right ?

another question what ms should i use for these line ?

icp_query_timeout 2000
maximum_icp_query_timeout 2000
Received on Thu Dec 17 2009 - 06:13:25 MST