Re: [squid-users] Repost: Squid 3.1.x uses considerably more memory than 2.7.x or 3.0.x

From: Ralf Hildebrandt <Ralf.Hildebrandt_at_charite.de>
Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2010 10:47:00 +0200

* Amos Jeffries <squid3_at_treenet.co.nz>:

> maximum_object_in_memory default was increased a bit in 3.1 to encompass
> most of the bell curve of small 'average' objects. 3.0 and earlier only
> memory-cached the lower half of the range.

maximum_object_size_in_memory?
From 8KB to 512kb.

> Unless you explicitly configured cache_mem its default size has also taken
> a bigger jump to accommodate ~10,000 of the average memory cacheable
> objects.

A bit ... from 8MB to 256MB :)

> 3.1 will now also do true promotion of objects from disk into memory cache
> if they become hot.

I see.

> > The image can be found here:
> http://www.arschkrebs.de/bugs/squid-object.png
> >
>
> Access forbidden apparently.

Uhm it works.

-- 
Ralf Hildebrandt
  Geschäftsbereich IT | Abteilung Netzwerk
  Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin
  Campus Benjamin Franklin
  Hindenburgdamm 30 | D-12203 Berlin
  Tel. +49 30 450 570 155 | Fax: +49 30 450 570 962
  ralf.hildebrandt@charite.de | http://www.charite.de
	    
Received on Thu Jul 29 2010 - 08:47:12 MDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Thu Jul 29 2010 - 12:00:05 MDT