Re: [squid-users] Cache firefox ok, chrome... not!

On Wed, 2010-12-08 at 18:19 +1300, Amos Jeffries wrote:
> On 08/12/10 16:51, Rodolfo Alcazar Portillo wrote:
> > With Firefox, "TCP_MEM_HIT":
> > 1291778947.206 0 127.0.0.1 TCP_MEM_HIT/200 626 GET http://www.elpais.com/css/i_portadillas.css? - NONE/- text/css
...
> > The VERY SAME PAGE with Google Chrome, several reloads, always "TCP_MISS":
> > 1291778941.929 108 127.0.0.1 TCP_MISS/304 340 GET http://www.elpais.com/css/i_portadillas.css? - DIRECT/80.157.169.17 text/css
...
> You need to look at the headers they are sending Squid. See what is
> different between the two.

The message turns to TCP_REFRESH_UNMODIFIED/304 after clearing chrome's
cache, but it still grabbing the css, jpg, etc. from the server for each
request.

Answering to your questions: Squid 3.1.9, I'm john doe browsing an
unknown server. Don't want to cache all by ignore-cc. Just want to cache
things like css or jpg.

Please check the chrome headers (I deleted the irrelevant, time of this
shot: 09:13):

BROWSER REQUEST:
================
GET http://www.elpais.com/css/i_portadillas.css?update=13201012042222 HTTP/1.1
Cache-Control: max-age=0
If-Modified-Since: Sat, 04 Dec 2010 21:22:54 GMT
...

SQUID RESPONSE:
===============
HTTP/1.0 304 Not Modified
Last-Modified: Sat, 04 Dec 2010 21:22:54 GMT
Cache-Control: max-age=32222
Date: Thu, 09 Dec 2010 08:12:52 GMT
Warning: 110 squid/3.1.9 "Response is stale"
Warning: 111 squid/3.1.9 "Revalidation failed"
X-Cache: HIT from rodolfoap.rap.es
X-Cache-Lookup: HIT from rodolfoap.rap.es:3128
...

Squid log for this request:
1291882372.347 125 127.0.0.1 TCP_REFRESH_UNMODIFIED/304 432 GET http://www.elpais.com/css/i_portadillas.css? - DIRECT/80.156.250.8 text/css

(the same produces a HIT with firefox! chrome grabs the css every time). What are those warnings?

Thanks.
----------------------------------------------
Rodolfo Alcazar Portillo - nospaze_at_gmail.com
otbits.blogspot.com / counter.li.org: #367962
----------------------------------------------
"Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from a rigged
demo" -- Andy Finkel
Received on Thu Dec 09 2010 - 08:28:45 MST