hello,
have something in question that i does not make it clear?
Thanks
2011/5/2 igor rocha <igorlogos_at_gmail.com>
>
> hello,
> no, this is not the problem, it was a typo, I checked in my file and
> it are with -, ie to round-robin .
> 2011/5/2 Amos Jeffries <squid3_at_treenet.co.nz>:
> > On Mon, 2 May 2011 18:07:53 -0300, igor rocha wrote:
> >>
> >> See, I'm configuring my squid.conf intending it to run in mesh:
> >>
> >> cache_peer 192.168.15.200 parent 3128 0 no-query round robin
> >> cache_peer 192.168.15.201 parent 3128 0 no-query round robin
> >> cache_peer 192.168.15.202 parent 3128 0 no-query round robin
> >> cache_peer 192.168.15.203 parent 3128 0 no-query round robin
> >>
> >> My scenario is that there are four nodes, a front-end and the other
> >> nodes. As it is configured, when sent to the node IP , he accumulates
> >> more bytes than the other three nodes. I wonder whether we can make an
> >> ideal balancing ? If yes, how to do it?
> >
> > You are missing a "-" in the option name "round-robin". If Squid is ignoring
> > them that would drop you back to the default first-available logics which
> > acts like you describe.
>
> hello,
> no, this is not the problem, i erred in the hour of the copy, I
> checked in my file and it are with -, ie to round-robin .
> >
> > Amos
> >
> >
Received on Wed May 04 2011 - 17:05:52 MDT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Wed May 04 2011 - 12:00:02 MDT