Re: [squid-users] Mesh

 On Wed, 4 May 2011 14:03:12 -0300, igor rocha wrote:
> hello,
> have something in question that i does not make it clear?
>

 No, the problem seems clear now. Reason for it is a mystery.

 I didn't answer to see if anyone else knew of it and would post, but
 apparently not. Time for some deep digging on your part.
 "debug_options 44,6" will log the peer selection logic debug into
 cache.log for use in figuring this out.

 Amos

> Thanks
>
> 2011/5/2 igor rocha <igorlogos_at_gmail.com>
>
>> hello,
>> no, this is not the problem, it was a typo, I checked in my file and
>> it are with -, ie to round-robin .
>> 2011/5/2 Amos Jeffries:
>> > On Mon, 2 May 2011 18:07:53 -0300, igor rocha wrote:
>> >>
>> >> See, I'm configuring my squid.conf intending it to run in mesh:
>> >>
>> >> cache_peer 192.168.15.200 parent 3128 0 no-query round robin
>> >> cache_peer 192.168.15.201 parent 3128 0 no-query round robin
>> >> cache_peer 192.168.15.202 parent 3128 0 no-query round robin
>> >> cache_peer 192.168.15.203 parent 3128 0 no-query round robin
>> >>
>> >> My scenario is that there are four nodes, a front-end and the
>> other
>> >> nodes. As it is configured, when sent to the node IP , he
>> accumulates
>> >> more bytes than the other three nodes. I wonder whether we can
>> make an
>> >> ideal balancing ? If yes, how to do it?
>> >
>> > You are missing a "-" in the option name "round-robin". If Squid
>> is
>> ignoring
>> > them that would drop you back to the default first-available
>> logics which
>> > acts like you describe.
>>
>> hello,
>> no, this is not the problem, i erred in the hour of the copy, I
>> checked in my file and it are with -, ie to round-robin .
>> >
>> > Amos
>> >
>> >
>>
Received on Wed May 04 2011 - 23:00:21 MDT