Re: [squid-users] Re: squid with pdns, bandwidth control issue

On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 4:54 PM, Amos Jeffries <squid3_at_treenet.co.nz> wrote:
> On 29/06/2012 11:02 p.m., Muhammad Yousuf Khan wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 3:34 PM, Amos Jeffries wrote:
>>>
>>> On 29/06/2012 10:09 p.m., Muhammad Yousuf Khan wrote:
>>>>
>>>> see the ping delay of my proxy server.
>>>> see first few lines which is before download when i start download a
>>>> huge file it when to 3000 which is too much and this is the only
>>>> reason i think why it is happening. now at the bottem of this ping
>>>> responce you will see when i cancled the download job things back to
>>>> normal.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Uhm, the entire network connectivity to a box going slow because one
>>> application is running...
>>
>> sorry i didnt get your point, i mean i am working in a small network
>> with just 30 nodes and i think it should easily handle the 30 node
>> network becuase in my last company i was using IPCOP which was an
>> excellent firewall with squid and it runs well with 120 users with
>> same specs, btw what do you mean by "my box is slow becuase one
>> application is running"
>
>
> The buffer bloat description should explain it a bit better than I can.
> Essentially there is no reason why ping should be affected so badly by Squid
> (or any other program) moving TCP packets. Regardless of the number of users
> or network size. But due to buffer and queue problems, it often does.
>

>
>>
>> note : i am using KVM virtual machine.
>
>
> Hmm. IIRC there was some problem found a year ago with virtual machines. We
> narrowed it down to something inside the image. Newely created VM had no
> issues but cloned ones (even cloned from a fresh new image) would go very
> slow under load for no identifiable reason. Your issue might be that.

yes i am using a clone of the orignal VM. right now i have deleted the
orignal one and i have already performe a lot of work in the machine.
so creating a new one mean i have to work on the new one alot.

any suggestion how to come out of this issue. instead waisting of time.

>
> Amos
>
Received on Fri Jun 29 2012 - 12:19:38 MDT