[squid-users] Re: cache_dir size v.s. available RAM

From: HillTopsGM <emailgregagain_at_gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 31 Aug 2013 09:14:28 -0700 (PDT)

I am not sure if I should start another thread with this - my apologies for
bumping it . . .

but in the last post I was looking to see if these 4 steps was a sensible
method of telling the proxy to only cache certain sites:

*
> STEP 1/4
*
> acl noproxy dstdomain .com .net .org <==== etc, etc.
*
> Would that work (would that be the way to 'wildcard' those domains)?
*
>
> always_direct allow noproxy
> cache deny noproxy
*
> STEP 2/4:
*
> Then for Each site, in particular, I want cached (like the Windows update
> sites) create rules like this:
>
> cache allow windowsupdate
>
> NOTE: I chose 'windowsupdate' as that is what was used for the acl rules
> on the FAQ page here >>
> http://wiki.squid-cache.org/SquidFaq/WindowsUpdate
> <http://wiki.squid-cache.org/SquidFaq/WindowsUpdate>
>
*
> STEP 3/4
*
> , Next I was thinking that I'd have to add is acl's for
> acl windowsupdate dstdomain microsoft.com
> acl windowsupdate dstdomain windowsupdate.com
> acl windowsupdate dstdomain my.windowsupdate.website.com
>
> . . . as I see that those domains are part of the refresh rules for the
> windows updates but not the acl's.
> To be on the safe side I thought that I'd add them to make sure anything
> that comes from there would be cached as per the
*
> cache allow windowsupdate
*
> rule.
>
> I am still wondering why they WERE NOT included in the group of acl's
> listed on that page.
> Comments on that?
*
> STEP 4/4
*
> , Lastly, all I'd have to do is add an acl for sites that I want to be
> cached in addition to the windows updates like so:
>
> acl windowsupdate dstdomain .mozilla.org
> acl windowsupdate dstdomain .adobe.com
> acl windowsupdate dstdomain .java.com
> acl windowsupdate dstdomain .nvidia.com
> etc, etc, etc,
>
> . . . Would THIS set up not cache ONLY the sites that I list, and by doing
> so ensure that all the windows updates never get overwritten by the 'Daily
> caching' of stuff I don't care about?
>
> Does that make sense?

Thanks again for any suggestions.

--
View this message in context: http://squid-web-proxy-cache.1019090.n4.nabble.com/cache-dir-size-v-s-available-RAM-tp4661705p4661868.html
Sent from the Squid - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Received on Sat Aug 31 2013 - 16:15:10 MDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sat Aug 31 2013 - 12:00:30 MDT