RE: [squid-users] which version of squid is more stable and less cpu greedy?

>Um. Are you swapping between versions and using the same cache_dir?

Oh. Nope
This is the testing process:

Installed Ubuntu12.04---------create SNAPSHOT_1----------install
3.1.19-----------put traffic(150Mbps)==30%CPU without any drop in bandwidth
graph
Moving back to SNAPSHOT_1---------install 3.3.8----------- put
traffic(150Mbps)==100%CPU with sudden drop in bandwidth graph
BTW I am not using any cache_dir. I just use memory swap...

It is now clear for me that 3.3.8 cannot cope with the traffic due to:
1-my wrong configuration 2-my wrong compilation 3-OR some problems
in squid
I am madly eager to solve the problem...

-----Original Message-----
From: Amos Jeffries [mailto:squid3_at_treenet.co.nz]
Sent: Saturday, August 31, 2013 12:20 PM
To: squid-users_at_squid-cache.org
Subject: Re: [squid-users] which version of squid is more stable and less
cpu greedy?

On 31/08/2013 7:45 p.m., Mohsen Dehghani wrote:
> I have to say that two versions will be installed on the same VM. I
> create a snapshot and install 3.1.19=about 10% CPU. And then go back
> to that snapshot and compile and install 3.3.8=99%CPU....I don't know
> how to figure out the cause :(

Um. Are you swapping between versions and using the same cache_dir?

3.3 does an automatic upgrade of the swap.state file when its started with
one created by 3.1. That involves a lot of CPU scanning the disk files for a
while.

Amos
Received on Sat Sep 07 2013 - 07:21:21 MDT