Re: [squid-users] Plans for 2.5?

From: Adam Lang <aalang@dont-contact.us>
Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2001 11:43:24 -0400

And I recall being mentioned on the list: SSL endpoints. That is mighty
interesting.

Adam Lang
Systems Engineer
Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company
http://www.rutgersinsurance.com
----- Original Message -----
From: "Chemolli Francesco (USI)" <ChemolliF@GruppoCredit.it>
To: "'Stefan Berg'" <stefan.berg@ausystem.com>;
<squid-users@squid-cache.org>
Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2001 11:43 AM
Subject: RE: [squid-users] Plans for 2.5?

>
> > Hi,
> >
> > what are the current plan for further development of version
> > 2.5 of squid?
>
> Check http://squid.sourgeforge.net/ for a comprehensive list of the
ongoing
> projects.
> Among the others I remember, support for authentication schemes other than
> Basic (NTLM and Digest), more comprehensive support for HTTP/1.1, general
> speed
> improvements, improved reverse-proxy support, improved support for
Win*dows,
> general reworking of the sqid internals for improved modularization,
> swapping from Autoconf to Automake+Autoconf+libtool, Chunked Mempools to
> reduce memory overhead.
>
> >
> > Could you give a ballpark figure of when it may be released
> > in a STABLE
> > version?
>
> I can't, I believe that no timeframe has been set yet.
>
> --
> /kinkie
Received on Tue Jun 05 2001 - 09:42:03 MDT

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 17:00:29 MST